<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomas Nelson Unveils New Bible Translation</title>
	<link>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/</link>
	<description>Press releases from Thomas Nelson Publishers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Protege Rod</title>
		<link>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Protege Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>When will The VOICE Old Testament be released? The VOICE seems to be accurate, complete, and very readable; my criteria for evaluating a translation. Once the Old Testament of The VOICE is completed, I will have my core of translations- New King James Version, New Century Version, and The VOICE, all Thomas Nelson products! I really like these translations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will The VOICE Old Testament be released? The VOICE seems to be accurate, complete, and very readable; my criteria for evaluating a translation. Once the Old Testament of The VOICE is completed, I will have my core of translations- New King James Version, New Century Version, and The VOICE, all Thomas Nelson products! I really like these translations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaShawn</title>
		<link>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>LaShawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>What makes the Voice Bible different from the next? You have been publishing Bible's since 1798, and yet you still find fascinating ways to continue interpreting the words in your books. If you were actually comparing scriptures from the original Hebrew and Greek formats, then there isn't much to use, due to those copies being fragments. Albeit there have been a numerous editions published over decades, there is only one Bible that speaks the true King James message and that's the Revised edition dated in 1611. Most Bibles after that are virtually replica's of another replica. In 2 Peter 1: 20 it enlightens the reader that "there are no interpretation for the Scriptures, for teh word did not come by the will of man, but by men who were moved by the Holy Spirit." Even more interesting, in Revelation 22: 18 &#38; 19 of your many Bibles published, it reads that no one is to add to the words of this book or take away words from this book. Furthermore, in I Corinthians 2: 14 it reads: "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."

Which makes me question the integrity of your publishing efforts. It seems you are merely using the Bible has a means of funding and financial gain. Yes, 2 Timothy 3: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine... But remember, the key phrase is "inspiration of God".

Please beware that it is extremely important to publish your revised edition Bible's the way the original manuscripts you proclaim to be using. I have noticed a lot of your Bible's don't read the same from verse to verse. In fact, you have published some Bibles that have a few scriptures missing altogether. So, please make sure your educated biblical scholar's are followng proper protocol when editing teh material, it helps to cut down litigation's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes the Voice Bible different from the next? You have been publishing Bible&#8217;s since 1798, and yet you still find fascinating ways to continue interpreting the words in your books. If you were actually comparing scriptures from the original Hebrew and Greek formats, then there isn&#8217;t much to use, due to those copies being fragments. Albeit there have been a numerous editions published over decades, there is only one Bible that speaks the true King James message and that&#8217;s the Revised edition dated in 1611. Most Bibles after that are virtually replica&#8217;s of another replica. In 2 Peter 1: 20 it enlightens the reader that &#8220;there are no interpretation for the Scriptures, for teh word did not come by the will of man, but by men who were moved by the Holy Spirit.&#8221; Even more interesting, in Revelation 22: 18 &amp; 19 of your many Bibles published, it reads that no one is to add to the words of this book or take away words from this book. Furthermore, in I Corinthians 2: 14 it reads: &#8220;But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which makes me question the integrity of your publishing efforts. It seems you are merely using the Bible has a means of funding and financial gain. Yes, 2 Timothy 3: &#8220;All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine&#8230; But remember, the key phrase is &#8220;inspiration of God&#8221;.</p>
<p>Please beware that it is extremely important to publish your revised edition Bible&#8217;s the way the original manuscripts you proclaim to be using. I have noticed a lot of your Bible&#8217;s don&#8217;t read the same from verse to verse. In fact, you have published some Bibles that have a few scriptures missing altogether. So, please make sure your educated biblical scholar&#8217;s are followng proper protocol when editing teh material, it helps to cut down litigation&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer @ Quiverfull Family</title>
		<link>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer @ Quiverfull Family</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Sounds fascinating!  I hope this one will be available through your book blogger program in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds fascinating!  I hope this one will be available through your book blogger program in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Voice &#171; Better Bibles Blog</title>
		<link>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>The Voice &#171; Better Bibles Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://news.thomasnelson.com/2008/11/03/thomas-nelson-unveils-new-bible-translation/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...]  The newest English Bible version is The Voice. Its New Testament has just been published by Thomas Nelson. You can read more about this new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  The newest English Bible version is The Voice. Its New Testament has just been published by Thomas Nelson. You can read more about this new [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
